The allure of a Rolex Submariner is undeniable. Its robust design, legendary reliability, and iconic status have cemented its place as one of the most sought-after watches globally. Within the Submariner community, a persistent myth surrounds the existence of a "no-hole" Submariner, specifically referencing models without the characteristic drilled lug holes. This article will delve into this misconception, examining the history of the Submariner, the function of lug holes, and clarifying the reality behind the elusive "Rolex no holes" legend.
The persistent rumour of a Rolex Submariner without lug holes often centers around the 14060M and the 16610. Let's address these models specifically and debunk the myth once and for all.
The 14060M: A Definitive Answer
The Rolex 14060M, a no-date Submariner produced from 1989 to 2000, is often cited in discussions about "Rolex no holes." However, the claim that a 14060M exists without lug holes is demonstrably false. Every single authentic 14060M ever produced features the drilled lug holes. These holes are integral to the watch's design and facilitate the attachment of strap changing tools, enabling easier and safer strap changes. Any claim of a 14060M without lug holes should immediately raise serious doubts about the watch's authenticity.
The 16610: Another Case of Misinformation
The Rolex 16610, the date Submariner produced between 1988 and 2000, is another model frequently mentioned in the context of "Rolex no holes." Again, this is inaccurate. All authentic 16610 models feature the characteristic drilled lug holes. The absence of lug holes on a purported 16610 would be a strong indicator of a counterfeit or a heavily modified watch.
Rolex Lug Holes: Function and Significance
The drilled lug holes on a Rolex Submariner, and indeed on many other Rolex models, are not merely aesthetic features. They serve a crucial practical purpose: facilitating spring bar removal and strap changes. Using specialized tools, watchmakers and owners can easily access the spring bars that hold the bracelet or strap in place. This allows for quick and straightforward strap changes without risking damage to the watch case or the bracelet. The holes provide a secure and precise point of leverage for these tools, ensuring a smooth and safe operation. The absence of these holes would make strap changes significantly more difficult, potentially leading to scratches or damage to the watch case.
Rolex Lug Holes vs. No Lug Holes: A Comparative Analysis
The comparison between a Rolex Submariner with lug holes and a hypothetical one without is stark. While the absence of holes might appeal to some seeking a cleaner aesthetic, it comes at the cost of practicality. The ease and safety of strap changes are paramount, especially for a tool watch like the Submariner. Furthermore, the presence of lug holes serves as a key authentication point for collectors. The absence of these holes is a strong red flag indicating a potential counterfeit.
Rolex No Holes Reviews (or the Lack Thereof)
current url：https://xjtgvh.quocankhang.com/global/rolex-no-holes-59822